Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (USA, 2009)
Directed by Phil Lord & Christopher Miller
For more of my thoughts on Eraserhead, check out The Movie Hour podcast here.
NEXT REVIEW: Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (2016)
Directed by Phil Lord & Christopher Miller
Starring Bill Hader, Anna Faris, James Caan, Andy Samberg
When
a given genre or medium becomes dominated by two major players with
opposing approaches, it can be very difficult for a new, alternative
talent to muscle in and take some of the glory. Film fans can be a
tribal and contradictory bunch: we demand the moon on a stick in
terms of innovation, and yet complain when a given director or studio
doesn’t meet their usual standards (i.e. producing the same thing
over and over again). The increasing conservatism of Hollywood
compounds this problem; there’s no shortage of formulaic work out
there, and truly novel films struggle to fight for their share of the
oxygen of publicity.
Since
the late-1990s, mainstream animation in the west has been divided
into two camps: PIXAR, which believes in making films which all the
family can enjoy on the same level, and Dreamworks, whose films have
one set of jokes for children and another set for adults. Cloudy
with a Chance of Meatballs (Cloudy
hereafter) falls
somewhere between the two approaches; it’s replete with references
to other films and is as bombastic and hyperactive as Dreamworks, but
it can also be enjoyed by people of all ages and keeps its
relationships at the heart of the action. Most of all, it’s one of
the strangest and best children’s films of its time, oozing with
visual imagination and possessing
a welcomely
surreal sensibility.
Mark
Kermode described the film as “the
kind of kids' movie David Lynch would have made had he not been so
busy fooling around with the animated segments of
Eraserhead.”
It’s hard to think of another mainstream animated film of
this period (besides Coraline,
at least)
which has been this confident in filling its screen with uneasy or
pleasantly disturbing imagery. It’s not just the walking chickens
which feel eerie or off-kiltre: whether it’s the slow-motion of
Flint falling in love, the Mayor’s balloon-like physique and
“choice” speech, or even the stretchiness of the characters,
almost everything in the film has an uncanny, strange quality which
helps to make it distinctive. Even
in the moments which are unsettling, the boldness of its visual
decisions keeps you hooked in.
Aside
from setting itself apart visually, this bizarre sensibility (which
owes a certain amount to Yellow
Submarine)
helps to lift the film both as a comedy and as a story about family.
We’ve become used to animated films
which fling their characters around for the sake of quick and easy
laughs, but throw in a monkey with a speech translator and giant food
and it all feels fresh again. Equally, we’ve
grown used to dramas about a son trying to make his parents proud
while rebelling against what they want for him. Flint’s
inventions turn his big dreams and well-meaning but misplaced
ambitions into a terrifying reality; we share in his frustrations as
his father fails to appreciate him, but also sympathise with the
latter as the speed of change causes a communication barrier. The
ending may be sentimental, but it earns the
right to do that
with a combination of well-built
spectacle and sufficient quiet periods for the characters to develop
and interact.
Like
many great children’s films, Cloudy
is
both a celebration of the imagination and a cautionary tale about
responsibility. Flint is unquestionably a bright and imaginative
individual, but his greatest flaw is not thinking through the
implications of his inventions – he invents spray-on shoes but it
never occurred to him that he might someday want to take them off.
His father has the opposite problem, being so conservative and worn
down by the tedious realities of small town life that he lacks any
imagination or creativity of his own. The arcs the characters undergo
may not be the most ground-breaking in cinema, but their development
is believable and there’s plenty of hilarity involving both of them
to see us through.
In
light of its eerie sensibility and characters who indulge themselves
in unhealthy food, the film merits a comparison to Tim Burton’s
Charlie and theChocolate Factory.
Burton’s
interest in all that is Gothic and grotesque was an excellent means
of bringing out Roald Dahl’s dislike of excess and greed which
permeates the original novel – by serving up a collection of warped
and exaggerated characters, Charlie’s genuine joy and sense of
wonder shines
through. Phil
Lord
and Christopher
Miller
employ a similar technique here, as
Flint’s animation becomes more naturalistic and under-stated as the
world goes weirder and around him.
Both
films also depart from their source material in a largely beneficial
way; for
all the merits of the original children’s book (published in the
late-1970s), this is a more coherent and enjoyable tale with a more
solid narrative.
One
of the big complaints about Dreamworks films – and especially the
later Shreks
– is the abundance of references to more adult films and media
which will go over the heads of much of the target audience. This
isn’t an exclusively Dreamworks issue (Disney did it with Aladdin,
for instance), and it’s quite understandable for creative people
who are devoted to cinematic storytelling to want to pay tribute to
those who came before. But it becomes a problem when whole sequences
are shaped around the reference or pop culture joke – the princess
fight in Shrek the Third
feels
like it only exists because someone really liked Led Zeppelin’s
‘Immigrant Song’, not because that was what the film really
needed at that point.
The
nice thing about Cloudy
from
this perspective is that it manages to be surprisingly cine-literate
in a way which doesn’t disrupt or overshadow the plot. If you know
your cinema it won’t take you long to spot all the films to which
it tips its hat – the ship flying away as the machine explodes is
the climax of Return of the Jedi,
the monkey ripping out the gummy bear’s heart is from Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom,
the shots of Flint standing in the rain of food with his arms aloft
is a neat riff on The Shawshank Redemption,
and of course Eraserhead
hangs
over the whole thing, as we’ve established.
Lord
and Miller have described the film as a homage to disaster movies,
citing as inspiration Twister,
Armageddon,
The Core and
The Day After Tomorrow.
Twister is
the most clearly referenced on a visual level, while Armageddon
and
The Core’s
contribution lies in the mission to stop the machine, and the
(un)natural disasters that spread all
over
the world are a delightful take-off of Roland Emmerich’s work. But
even
if
you don’t pick up on any or all of these little moments, the film
still clicks
and runs beautifully; you certainly don’t feel like the film is
being held up by these moments, and
it still feels like its own beast rather than just a parade of
knowing nods to
other people’s work.
Cloudy’s
irresistible energy is sustained by a very capable voice cast, many
of whom are surprisingly good compared to their other output around
this time. Anna Faris is a lot of fun and very charming, to the
extent that her performance here is almost enough to redeem her
appearances in The House
Bunny or
Just Friends.
Bill Hader’s output is very inconsistent, but here he’s firing on
all cylinders, being funny and endearing without either emotion
coming across as forced. James Caan is an excellent choice as Flint’s
father – it’s among the better performances in his late-period
roster of grumpy or cantankerous
characters. And Bruce Campbell’s Mayor is a
real highlight, with the actor bringing subtle threat to his
performance as the plot develops and the character’s
waistline bulges.
The
only real flaw with Cloudy,
like many films of the period, is the 3D. When a film has this much
eye-popping spectacle (not to mention Mr T’s character bouncing all
over the place whenever anything goes wrong), we don’t need things
endlessly coming out of the screen at us to keep us engaged or
interested. In this regard the film falls between two stalls; the 3D
doesn’t feel essential as we are led to assume it was in Avatar,
but neither does it completely function without it in the way that
Coraline managed
– it has the tell-tale sign of certain shots being staged simply to
utilise the glasses, in a way which instantly dates the film and
prevents it from perfectly translating to home media. It’s by no
means a deal-breaker, but it is an annoying quibble for an otherwise
stunning film.
Cloudy
with a Chance of Meatballs is
a great children’s film which balances its huge and strange
spectacle with a good story and a relevant moral. As well as packing
a bit more substance than you might expect, its characters are fun
and endearing and there are enough unusual or bizarre moments in it
to keep you talking afterwards and reward repeat viewings. While
Coraline remains
the best animated film of 2009, this comes a very close second and is
a must-see for fans of animation.
For more of my thoughts on Eraserhead, check out The Movie Hour podcast here.
NEXT REVIEW: Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (2016)
relevant moral
ReplyDelete