Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (UK/ USA, 2005)
Directed by Tim Burton
Starring Johnny Depp, Freddie Highmore, David Kelly, Helena Bonham Carter
The sad death of Gene Wilder earlier this year saw not only an outpouring of tributes but a re-examination of his work. The cult status of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, and Wilder's performance therein, has swelled over the the last 45 years to the point where the film has become a lynchpin among classic children's films, like Mary Poppins before it. For some people, Wilder will always be Willy Wonka, and no-one could ever hope to equal him, let along exceed him.
NEXT REVIEW: Amazing Journey: The Story of The Who (2007)
Directed by Tim Burton
Starring Johnny Depp, Freddie Highmore, David Kelly, Helena Bonham Carter
The sad death of Gene Wilder earlier this year saw not only an outpouring of tributes but a re-examination of his work. The cult status of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, and Wilder's performance therein, has swelled over the the last 45 years to the point where the film has become a lynchpin among classic children's films, like Mary Poppins before it. For some people, Wilder will always be Willy Wonka, and no-one could ever hope to equal him, let along exceed him.
In
the face of such a popular performance, not to mention the other
memorable aspects of Mel Stuart's film, you wouldn't think that any
remake would have stood a chance. Tim Burton's only previous attempt
at a remake - Planet
of the Apes
- had tarnished his reputation badly, and while he had redeemed
himself with Big
Fish,
there were still big question marks over his treatment of beloved
source materials. Charlie
and the Chocolate Factory
(Charlie
hereafter)
is
now 11 years old, and like its predecessor it may take another few
decades for audiences to properly appreciate its qualities. But even
this far out, it is a great adaptation which, if anything, is more
faithful to the book and closer to the spirit of what Roald Dahl
wanted to get across.
Like
Burton's Batman,
Charlie took
a long time to make it to the screen. Dahl had disowned the original
film due to the changes made to his screenplay, and the producers'
refusal to cast the late Spike Milligan as Willy Wonka. In
light of this, Dahl
refused to release the rights to the sequel, Charlie
and the Great Glass Elevator,
and after his death in 1990 his estate became increasingly guarded
about adaptations of his work.
Out
of Sight screenwriter
Scott Frank and future director of The Hunger Games Gary
Ross came close to getting the green light in February 2000, but both
left the project 18 months and several rewrites later. Martin
Scorsese was fleetingly tipped to take over
before he chose to make The
Aviator,
and there was even talk of Ace
Ventura: Pet Detective director
Tom Shadyac taking the reins with Jim Carrey as Willy Wonka - a
prospect thankfully vetoed by the Dahl estate. Burton finally got the
job in 2003, bringing with him Big
Fish screenwriter
John August; Dahl's widow Felicity had been impressed by Burton's
work as a producer on Henry Selick's version of James
and the Giant Peach,
and the pair bonded over their mutual dislike for the original
adaptation.
The
first thing that Charlie
gets
right is the way that it looks. Despite having a decent colour
palette, Stuart's film looks for all the world like a TV movie: with
the exception of the famously terrifying tunnel sequence - the only
truly great scene in the film - every scene feels small and hemmed
in, as though the "pure imagination" could only be seen
from a certain angle. From the outset, with a typically elaborate
opening credit sequence, you feel like you're in an extraordinarily
creative
and yet gruesome
world, with magic lurking in even the tiniest item
on show.
There's still an intimacy to it, thanks to both the performers
and Danny Elfman's score, but there's much more of a wow factor
(or yuk factor)
to both the set-pieces and the journeys between them.
Much
like James,
Charlie wrestles
with the need to adapt a very British story in a way that American
audiences would understand. In this respect at least, Burton deserves
credit for not straying too far from the source; while Selick's
creative choices on James
did
work well, some viewers weren't all that happy with the mechanical
shark, the pirate crew or not seeing the terrifying Cloudmen
from book.
Unlike a lot of American directors, Burton resists making the British
scenes unbelievably twee and touristy; by rooting the look of his
film in the fantastical (for instance, siting a tumbledown thatched
cottage right near a towering factory), the project retains an
international flavour which compliments the characterisation and
makes its themes easier to translate.
Charlie
nails both the themes and spirit of the original story in a way that
the previous version simply didn't manage. The book is, at its heart,
a warning about materialistic excess and greed, using the Western
world's slavering desire to consume chocolate as a cautionary tale of
how modern society makes us lose sight of the most important things
in life. Grandpa George's illuminating deconstruction of money is
just as effective in this regard as the montages
of
the various
searches
for the golden tickets. Burton brilliantly contrasts the soulness,
empty actions by which the other children find their tickets (ripping
bars off the shelves, employing
factory workers, hacking
the delivery
system
or just eating yourself sick) with the special, personal joy
experienced by Charlie. The film rises above mere sentimentality and
captures that childlike sense
of ecstasy
so very
well.
This
brings us to one of Burton's more controversial decisions, namely the
backstory invoving Willy Wonka's father. Making him a dentist is a
natural choice, and Christopher Lee is as good here as he was in his
all-too-brief role in Sleepy
Hollow.
But it does pivot back to James,
and the debate about fidelity to the book as a means of judging the
film's success. Dahl's
main
complaint
about the original was that it focussed too much on Wonka and too
little on Charlie. The remake does better, but it can't help pivoting
back to Wonka in the later stages as the unfinished business with his
father is resolved.
Notwithstanding
the obvious fact that being faithful to the source is no guarantee of
quality (cf.
the
first two Harry
Potter films),
the introduction of Wonka's backstory actually adds to the character.
Wonka in both the books is an elusive figure, with Charlie being the
only other person able to get onto his wavelight; he doesn't
deliberately withhold information or lie to the other protagonists,
but you always sense that
there's
more going on in his head than he's letting on. In other hands the
backstory chosen by August would seem pat and perfunctory, but Burton
plays it very carefully to illuminate one of Wonka's main
contradictions: he is simultaneously a rebellious free spirit, who
hates rules and responsibilities, and someone who is very guarded,
serious and principled on matters of the heart - including his
family,
whether biological or, in the case of Charlie, adopted.
This
combination of guardedness and wacky creativity is captured
beautifully in Johnny Depp's performance. Comparisons with
Michael Jackson are largely superficial, with critics
of the time
focussing too much on the make-up and not enough on the demons
lurking beneath the childlike smile and giggle. As Burton observed,
the character is much closer to Howard Hughes (making Scorsese's
involvement in the project rather ironic). Beyond the skintight
gloves and fear of human contact, Wonka reflects Hughes' obsession
with his work, his
consternation
over the tiniest details, the
variety of his talents and his paralysing
fear of death and ageing. The scene with the grey hair is beautifully
played by Depp as both a wry dig at modern
psychiatry
and a genuine moment of
existential
terror.
Depp's
performance is also balanced out nicely by the rest of the ensemble.
Freddie Highmore may be more overtly fresh-faced than his 1971
counterpart Peter Ostrum, but he resists playing him simply as a
goody-two-shoes; his more emotional moments don't come across as
mawkish, and he enjoys a strong bond with Depp (with whom he
previously worked on Finding Neverland).
Noah Taylor and Helena Bonham-Carter are a good fit for Charlie's
parents, and David Kelly (best known for his work on Fawlty
Towers) is a standout as Grandpa
Joe. Credit should also go to the underrated Missi Pyle, who makes
Violet's mother more interesting than she is in the book, and the
endlessly duplicated (and eternally patient) Deep Roy, who plays
every last one of the Oompa-Loompas.
The
only fly in the chocolate with Charlie
is
its music - or more specifically, its songs. They may
replicate the lyrics from Dahl's book, but the sound mixing
is atrocious: even after several watches to pick up all the misheard
words, the mix feels needlessly crowded and
chaotic.
Burton doesn't have a tin ear for music - as he would subsequently
prove with Sweeney
Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
- but he is surprisingly awkward and clueless about how to integrate
these moments into the plot.
Likewise the sequence outside Wonka's factory featuring the melting
puppets is either a failed nonsequitur or just a waste of time; it
has no reason to be there, serves no purpose in the plot, and robs
Depp of the distinctive entrance he deserves.
In
spite of its musical stumbles, Charlie
and the Chocolate Factory is
a great adaptation which is both more faithful to the original story
and more completely rewarding than the Mel Stuart version. Burton
uses the familiar territory to his advantage, giving Dahl's tale a
timeless quality and registers emotional depth where others would
have merely settled for sentimentality. It may never win over fans of
the Wilder version - including Wilder himself - but it remains a
compelling adaptation with warmth and subtlety to spare.
NEXT REVIEW: Amazing Journey: The Story of The Who (2007)
Comments
Post a Comment